Opened 18 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#95 closed bug (Fixed)
wvelocity
Reported by: | jcwarner | Owned by: | arango |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | Release ROMS/TOMS 3.1 |
Component: | Nonlinear | Version: | 3.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | WigginsW@… |
Description (last modified by )
wvelocity.F, near the bottom we have:
wvel(i,j,0)=cff1*(vert(i,j,1)- & (vert(i,j,2)-vert(i,j,1))* & 2.0_r8*(z_r(i,j,1)-z_w(i,j,0)))+ & cff2*vert(i,j,1)- & cff3*vert(i,j,2)
cff1, cff2, and cff3 are coefficients for the interpolation (just numbers). vert has dimensions of m/s. So this is:
( m/s - ( m/s - m/s)* 2 * (m)) + m/s + m/s
This does not look dimensionally correct. Same issue for wvel(i,j,N).
Change History (1)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → Fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Yes, the units for the bottom and surface boundary conditions do not match. The boundary conditions can be computed in different ways. This corrected by a linear extrapolation.