Opened 17 years ago
Closed 16 years ago
#200 closed request (Done)
passive tracer boundary conditions? — at Version 1
Reported by: | kate | Owned by: | arango |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | minor | Milestone: | Release ROMS/TOMS 3.2 |
Component: | Nonlinear | Version: | 3.2 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
I'm not understanding how the passive tracers get their boundary conditions. There's a clever way for them to be initialized differently from the active tracers with ANA_PASSIVE. There's a clever dye_ entry in varinfo.dat, but what about dye_west_ and friends?
What about analytic passive boundary conditions? I'm guessing there's something missing here.
Change History (1)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Resolution: | → Done |
Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Yes, thank you. I added the generic logic in varinfo.dat and mod_ncparam.F to process the variables for inert tracers boundary conditions:
There is not need to add an additional option or code for analytical lateral boundary conditions since ANA_TOBC and ana_tobc.h controls all the tracer fields. I not allowing to have both tracer boundary data (NetCDF file) and analytical expressions (ana_tobs.h) at the same time. You either set all the conditions for all tracers in ana_tobc.h or read all the data from NetCDG file. The tracer logic is ROMS is complex.