How to build ROMS in XeonPhi??(-mmic option,netcdf wrong)

Discussion on computers, ROMS installation and compiling

Moderators: arango, robertson

Post Reply
Message
Author
kissrang
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:13 pm
Location: YoungDong University

How to build ROMS in XeonPhi??(-mmic option,netcdf wrong)

#1 Unread post by kissrang »

Hello

I'm a Woong hee Choi. I am a student of South Korea a lot of interest in ocean modeling.
So I was looking for one of the open source, it tried to ROMS and WRF.
My computer is this specification.

processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 63
model name: Intel (R) Xeon (R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
stepping: 2
cpu MHz: 1200.000
cache size: 30720 KB
physical id: 0
siblings: 24
core id: 0
cpu cores: 12
apicid: 0
initial apicid: 0
fpu: yes
fpu_exception: yes
cpuid level: 15
wp: yes
flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid dca sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid
bogomips: 4999.86
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment: 64
address sizes: 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:


I've compiled the ROMS inside Xeon, was a success. Then I would like to turn the ROMS within Xeon Phi.

So I added a FFLAGS = -mmic to compile options.

FC: = ifort
FFLAGS: = -heap-arrays -fp-model precise -mmic
CPP: = / usr / bin / cpp
CPPFLAGS: = -P -traditional
LDFLAGS: =
AR: = ar
ARFLAGS: = r
MKDIR: = mkdir -p
RM: = rm -f
RANLIB: = ranlib
PERL: = perl
TEST: = test

MDEPFLAGS: = --cpp --fext = f90 --file = - --objdir = $ (SCRATCH_DIR)

But that was an error during compile ROMS within Xeon Phi. I think there seems to be a problem netcdf.

error message: ROMS / Bin / cpp_clean Build / esmf_roms.f90
cd Build; /opt/intel/composer_xe_2015.3.187/bin/intel64/ifort -c -heap-arrays -fp-model precise -mmic -openmp -fpp -ip -O3 es mf_roms.f90
/ Usr / bin / cpp -P -traditional -D_OPENMP -DLINUX -DX86_64 -DIFORT -D'ROOT_DIR = "/ home / test / MIC / ROMS_coco" '-DUPWELLING -D'HEADER = "upwelling.h"' -D ' ROMS_HEADER = "upwelling.h" '-DNestedGrids = -D'ANALYTICAL_DIR = "/ home / test / MIC / ROMS_coco / ROMS / Functionals"' - D'SVN_REV = "756M" '-IROMS / Include -IROMS / Nonlinear -IROMS / Nonlinear / Biology -IROMS / Nonlinear / Sediment -IROMS / Utility -IROMS / Dr ivers -IROMS / Functionals -IMaster -ICompilers -D'HEADER_DIR = "/ home / test / MIC / ROMS_coco / ROMS / Include" 'Master / master .F> Build /master.f90
ROMS / Bin / cpp_clean Build / master.f90
cd Build; /opt/intel/composer_xe_2015.3.187/bin/intel64/ifort -c -heap-arrays -fp-model precise -mmic -openmp -fpp -ip -O3 ma ster.f90
/opt/intel/composer_xe_2015.3.187/bin/intel64/ifort -heap-arrays -fp-model precise -mmic -openmp -fpp -ip -O3 Build / esmf_rom so Build / master.o Build / ocean_control.o Build / ocean_coupler .o Build / propagator.o Build / roms_export.o Build / roms_import.o -o oceanO Build / libUTIL.a Build / libNLM.a Build / libNLM_bio.a Build / libNLM_sed.a Build / libANA.a Build / libUTIL.a Build / libMODS.a -L / home / test / MIC / netcdf_4 / lib -lnetcdf
x86_64-k1om-linux-ld: skipping incompatible /home/test/MIC/netcdf_4/lib/libnetcdf.so when searching for -lnetcdf
x86_64-k1om-linux-ld: skipping incompatible /home/test/MIC/netcdf_4/lib/libnetcdf.a when searching for -lnetcdf
x86_64-k1om-linux-ld: can not find -lnetcdf

I obviously have a netcdf library. (Libnetcdf.so, libnetcdf.a)
It has netcdf 4.1.3 and 3.6.3.
There is no problem without -mmic. (in Xeon)

I do not know why this error . Please tell me some advice.
Thank you.

User avatar
kate
Posts: 4088
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: CFOS/UAF, USA

Re: How to build ROMS in XeonPhi??(-mmic option,netcdf wrong

#2 Unread post by kate »

Please don't double-post your questions.

Have you tried recompiling netcdf with the same -mmic option? I believe that's what it is asking for.

Post Reply