Ocean Modeling Discussion

ROMS/TOMS

Search for:
It is currently Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:40 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Mar 21, 2010 3:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:24 pm
Posts: 4
Location: institute of meteorology
Hi,
I'am working on simualting arctic ocean currents with ROMS (coupled with CSIM5) and found that the simulated surface currents were over influenced by Coriolis force and differed with resultes from others a lot . I wonder how can I tune model parameters to slow down ocean currents with wind forcing unchanged.

Thanks in advance for any comments or suggestions.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 6:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Posts: 3633
Location: IMS/UAF, USA
How are you handling the coupling to the ice? Are the ice speeds sensible?

I know a guy who could make his Arctic currents go either way, depending on variables we don't know very well. He gave up on modeling after that - maybe you should compare to observations rather than other models.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 2:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:24 pm
Posts: 4
Location: institute of meteorology
Thanks a lot for kate's response.
The ROMS supplies ocean currents, freeze/melt potential, and sea surface tilts to CSIM5. In my simulation, it's found that the ice currents are influenced a great deal by ocean currents. When ocean currents are set zero, the simulated sea ice currents are better than those with ocean currents from ROMS employed. The simulated ocean currents are not good. For example, the Transpolar Drift cann't be reproduced. The ocean currents near north pole seem to be a result of quasi-balance of coriolis force and surface driving due to wind stress and ocean-ice stress. I once made an experiment with no ice effect considered, i.e., there is no ice cover at all (the temperature of the uppermost layer is set to freezing point if it's below that value), there seems no improvement in the result. I guess, if the surface ocean currents are slow down to some extent and coriolis force reduces, the simulated currents' direction near the pole may be better. I'm sure the wind stress is appropriate.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group