Regarding salt flux parameterization

Cool Findings and Plots

Moderators: arango, robertson

Post Reply
Message
Author
yadusharma
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 3:09 pm
Location: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Regarding salt flux parameterization

#1 Post by yadusharma » Sat Jan 20, 2018 12:29 pm

Hi all,

I was trying to understand the salt flux parameterization in ROMS. From the literature, I understand that there are virtual salt flux are real freshwater flux methods. Which one ROMS use when BULK_FLUX is on?. How can I get more information in this regard?. I would be grateful for any suggestions/comments on this.

Thanking you all.

User avatar
kate
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: IMS/UAF, USA

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#2 Post by kate » Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:06 pm

We certainly don't have a real fresh water flux, it's more of a negative salt flux when it rains.

yadusharma
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 3:09 pm
Location: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#3 Post by yadusharma » Wed Jan 24, 2018 4:59 am

Hi Kate
Thanks for your reply. :) . I have one more question. :shock: I have rivers in my model domain and also i have activated the BULK_FlUX option. I just want to know that, is there a way to "keep the surface freshwater flux unaffected" by the river inputs (Low Salinity and Temperature)which i want to experiment. I would be grateful for any suggestions in this.

User avatar
kate
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: IMS/UAF, USA

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#4 Post by kate » Wed Jan 24, 2018 7:50 am

I don't know that what you ask is possible. Because we have the virtual salt flux, the salt flux from precip will depend on the surface salinity. If you change that with rivers, you will change the effect of E-P.

yadusharma
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 3:09 pm
Location: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#5 Post by yadusharma » Mon Mar 26, 2018 9:17 am

Hi Kate,
I found from the ROMS wiki that the surface salt flux with the RELAXATION is calculated as follows,
"
F_mod(:,:) = - Tnudg(isalt) * Hz(:,:,N) * [S_mod(:,:,N) - SSS(:,:)]
where Tnudg is a nudging time scale and Hz(:,:,N) is upper level thickness and Sea surface salinity (SSS) climatology".

But if I use SCORRECTION, how the above equation will be used/modified? :roll:.
I would be grateful for any suggestions regarding this.

User avatar
kate
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: IMS/UAF, USA

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#6 Post by kate » Mon Mar 26, 2018 3:18 pm

Both have the same equation, except in one case this is added to the existing salt flux and in the other case it replaces the existing salt flux.

yadusharma
Posts: 24
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2015 3:09 pm
Location: Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#7 Post by yadusharma » Wed May 02, 2018 12:06 pm

Hi Kate,
Thanks for your reply. I have one more question, what value I should choose for Tnudg (TNUDG) in days?. If I want to use the SCORRECTION. Thanks again for your support and time.

User avatar
kate
Posts: 3678
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2003 5:29 pm
Location: IMS/UAF, USA

Re: Regarding salt flux parameterization

#8 Post by kate » Wed May 02, 2018 2:04 pm

I don't care what you use, but you should know that in the trunk code, TNUDG is used for both SCORRECTION and for open boundaries, if you have them. I have opted to split them into two variables in my code. I've got the SCORRECTION one set to 90 days in most of my input files.

Post Reply