changed LBC options

Report or discuss software problems and other woes

Moderators: arango, robertson

Post Reply
Message
Author
allencapa

changed LBC options

#1 Post by allencapa » Fri Sep 28, 2018 2:52 am

Hi all,

I'm not sure if this is a bug or a hardware issue. I'm doing a restart test with ROMS svn904 but the LBC options were changed automatically from Shc to Red by the script during the simulation. It only happened for ubar/vbar but the location is random. It happened once for East (ubar) and South (vbar), and once for North (both). I'm using netcdf with parallel, could this be a potential issue? How could I determine where the error is from?

This is my .in file (the same as in the restart file)

Code: Select all

   LBC(isFsur) ==   Cha     Cha     Cha     Cha         ! free-surface
!  LBC(isUbar) ==   Fla     Fla     Fla     Fla         ! 2D U-momentum
!  LBC(isVbar) ==   Fla     Fla     Fla     Fla         ! 2D V-momentum
   LBC(isUbar) ==   Shc     Shc     Shc     Shc         ! 2D U-momentum
   LBC(isVbar) ==   Shc     Shc     Shc     Shc         ! 2D V-momentum
   LBC(isUvel) ==   RadNud  RadNud  RadNud  RadNud      ! 3D U-momentum
   LBC(isVvel) ==   RadNud  RadNud  RadNud  RadNud      ! 3D V-momentum
   LBC(isMtke) ==   Gra     Gra     Gra     Gra         ! mixing TKE
This is the output

Code: Select all

			"EDGE:  WEST   SOUTH  EAST   NORTH  \n",
			"zeta:  Cha    Cha    Cha    Cha    \n",
			"ubar:  Shc    Shc    Shc    Red    \n",
			"vbar:  Shc    Shc    Shc    Red    \n",
			"u:     RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud \n",
			"v:     RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud \n",
			"temp:  RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud \n",
			"salt:  RadNud RadNud RadNud RadNud" ;
Thank you,
Yi
Last edited by allencapa on Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:25 am, edited 2 times in total.

allencapa

Re: changed LBC options

#2 Post by allencapa » Fri Sep 28, 2018 3:07 am

I just tested without parallel nc and the results were ok, so it seems to be a netcdf issue, but how can I fix it?

allencapa

Re: changed LBC options

#3 Post by allencapa » Sat Sep 29, 2018 12:37 am

allencapa wrote:I just tested without parallel nc and the results were ok, so it seems to be a netcdf issue, but how can I fix it?
Sorry it turns out to be a compiler problem. The serial one is compiled with ifort 14.0.4 while the parallel one is with ifort 17.0.1. I also tried intel 17.0.1 but with debug on and the model is running well. So now the question becomes: what is the recommended compiling option for intel 17.0.1?

Thanks

Post Reply